The Best (or Worst) of British, (or in this case Australian on British), TV: Summer Heights High

No offence, but the best show I've seen lately is Australian. To be specific, Summer Heights High, which is a fabulous faux-documentary from creator, writer, actor, and all around funny man, Chris Lilley that is playing in London right now. Summer Heights High tells the 'story' of one term at the high school of the same name, specifically focusing on three characters: Ja'mie, Mr. G, and Jonah.

And here is where it gets funny. Lilley plays all three characters, and he plays them to perfection. Ja'mie is spending the semester at Summer Heights High in an exchange program with an exclusive private school. In Ja'mie (pronounced Ja-may, btw) Lilley has perfected that popular girl, "I'm better than you" stereotype. Her favorite phrase is, "no offence, but...(insert totally offensive phrase such as, "private school kids are smarter than public school kids") and "That's so totally random."


Mr. G, has been newly appointed as the Head of Drama, ahem "Head of Performing Arts, spread it" and he is over-the-top. He thinks he is teaching the most important subject, and is the most popular teach on campus. Please don't confuse him with the truth. He is currently producing and directing a play he wrote on an unfortunate death of a student, Annabelle Dickinson, due to a drug overdose ("She's got a bad habit, a bad habit for drugs"). Although he could barely remember her, he found that "the character of 'Mr. G' has become a larger role in the musical than originally planned." He also owns a little Pomeranian, prances around talking about the Centre for Performing Arts he wants to build (multi-million dollar, glass windowed, state-of-the-art, facility), and reserves the gym at all hours of the day, making him not the favorite person of the P.E. teacher.

Jonah is a "troubled Pacific Islander" who has been expelled from several schools. He's the 'smart but not living up to his potential' character, from a minority and marginalised group. He meets with the counsellor on a regular basis, and has written his own "behavioural contract," which he always breaks. Jonah has some of the most awesome lines, including "Puck You" and "Are you on your period, miss."

Lilley has captured typical high school life in Australia (which is similar to what I remember from my high school life in the U.S.) and has in the spirit of Arrested Development (because you know I had to go there) taken it to the extreme. Ja'mie regularly cracks me up at just how self-centered she is, and yet there is much truth to her relationship with the girls at the public school. The story line where Ja'mie was trashing the 'bogan' public school girls to her private school friends via MSN, and the ensuing fight, was eerily reminiscent of my high school years. It also shows the weird kind of power the leader of a group of girls has over her 'posse,' for whatever reasons. Mr. G, is just the poor, self-centered, over-confident, soul who is teaching drama instead of performing on Broadway, but he makes the best of it by being the cattiest teacher out there. Jonah is actually the most realistic portrayal, the way he lowers his eyes when not telling the truth, acts out when he is uncomfortable, and is always causing problems. All three characters make me laugh out loud, and I can't say that I have a favorite, though I know I have a soft spot for Jonah. I just want him to get it together, and be loved. And to answer your question: yes, I know he is fictional, and that if he actually got it together he wouldn't be half as funny.

Lilley is extremely talented and previously produced the television series We Can Be Heroes where the character of Ja'mie was introduced. (As soon as I can get my hands on that series, I'm sure I'll be writing about it too). I have to thank my Aussie flatmate for pointing out the series that has become "Sara's Latest Obsession." Summer Heights High is currently being aired in England, at 9:30 pm on Mondays, on BBC3, and in the United States, at 9:30 pm central time, on HBO. I wanted to include a clip montage of all the characters, but I couldn't really find one that was appropriate. I've embedded one of my favorite Jonah exchanges, from the first episode, which has the "I said puck you, miss, with a p." I will warn you that this clip is unedited and contains some choice words that sound like puck, but begin with a different letter.

On an unrelated note, I really must apologise for the total lack of posting in the past month or so. I've been having a tough time work wise and just simply didn't have the energy for posting. Things are calming down in that regard, and I really hope I'm through the worst. So, that coupled with the imminent return of Lost, means more posting for Sara.

Ok, enjoy Jonah, and go watch (however you can, I don't judge) Summer Heights High. And, "spread it" to all your friends. Otherwise, and "no offence," but "puck you."

A big week in reality.

I must confess that I love reality tv. Not the crass, attention-seeking losers that adorn the hours on MTV or VH1, but the "quality" shows of the main networks; Biggest Loser, Survivor, Amazing Race, etc. I LOVE competition shows! Not competitions to sleep around or fall in "love" with strangers but real competitions/challenges that these 3 shows thrive on. Now all of my shows have ended the fall season and 2 out of the 3 shows ended with my favorite people winning!

First of all, I *heart* Bob from Survivor. I am so glad that the good guy finally won. Not only the oldest ever winner, but the most (as it appears) intelligent, kind-hearted, crafty (in a good way), humble and honest. I have watched Survivor for years and I have never been so happy to see all of the drama unfold and the best person win. Suzie is nice, but just that, nice. Not much game play, no out-witting, no out-playing. Only out-lasting. Sugar was a great competitor and actually one of the strongest players, but she burned many of bridges to get there and didn't receive one vote. Not even a pity vote. Bob won both the competition and the viewer vote, walking away with not only a million, but a million, one hundred thousand. I think that is the first time that one person won both. Very telling. Bob, if you were my physics teacher, I may have liked science.

Amazing Race, my all-time favorite show ended, and pouting Star and her brother won. Not my favorite. But, out of the top three, I guess they were the best competitors. My favorite team ended up in forth place, not good enough for the finale. I still think this is the best reality show on tv and the Emmys consistently agree. I always cry at the finales, with the teams running in through the past competitors; cheesy, but good tv.

And lastly, Biggest Loser ended last night. I am SO thankful America for not voting Heba in the finale. I voted for Ed because both wanted Heba to win. Therefore, she did not deserve it, in my opinion. Ed blew the last challenge to allow his wife an easy in. Not so fast buster. You deserved it to! Vicki is reality tv's Satan; evil-playing, down-right mean, crass and did I say evil? Amy should have voted her out when she had the chance. Therefore, Michelle was my fav to win, and win she did!!! The girl lost 110 pounds, but more importantly, found her voice, her confidence and self-esteem. Reality tv at its best!

Mackey, I miss you.

Last month The Shield ended its series. I already miss my illegal, crupt and twisted friends from one of FXs (not to mention any channels) best shows. Mackey was the perfect 21st century character; a villian who every once and awhile, pulled at heart strings and makes the viewer actually feel sorry for the money-stealing, gang befriending, killing icon. The gritty, well directed, well acted, well written show broke the way for hour-long cable drama. Since then, it paved the way for Rescue Me, Damages, Nip/Tuck and all other excellent FX dramas. (Damages starts back up in January and I CAN'T WAIT!)

The Shield was tv acting at its best. The series finale left my jaw open, as his web of decict and stabbing left him exactly where he should be; alone. What a tangled web you weave Mackey, when first you practice to deceive. Good-bye my evil friend. Have fun working for the Feds in a small cubicle with no family, no friends and no issued firearm.

Thanks

Happy Thanksgiving, with some extra special Thanksgiving love to my Two Girls blogger, Jen, because (especially of late) she's kept this blog going. 

Have a safe, warm, and fulfilling Thanksgiving if you are American or living in the U.S., and well, a safe, warm, and fulfilling normal day if you aren't!

More cancelations.

It was announced on Nov 22 that three additional shows have been canceled, one of which I think is one of the best shows on tv. It should be a crime. 'Dirty Sexy Money' and the wonderfully dysfunctional Darlings will no longer grace my Wednesday nights. Boo hoo. Another show with great writing, great characters, and a fab storyline is on the chopping block. What is wrong with people? The additional shows that NBC has announced as canceled is Eli Stone and Pushing Daisies. Private Practice, the Grey's spin-off is moving time slots to Thursday night from Wednesday night. I think that is a good sign that the show will continue as it is now the follow-up to the most popular show on tv, Grey's Anatomy. I anticipate there will be more big studio cuts in the weeks that follow, but hopefully no more of my regular programming will be tinkered with.

To cancel or not to cancel

Last week I was mildly upset at the news that 'lipstick jungle' had been canceled. We have been fans since it premiered last year on NBC and actually look forward to the progressive, successful, sassy and beautiful ladies. The three main characters have wonderful story lines, great wardrobes and drama, drama, drama. So, what's the problem? Why do they not have a fan base? Of all the chickflick books out there, including "Lipstick Jungle" you would think that those loyal readers would also view the tv shows. Guess I am the only one.

Today on people.com I read a story that Brooke Shields said that the show has not yet been canceled. So, what's the deal? Is it canceled, or is it not? Accordingly to the article, the show was guaranteed 13 episodes and they are simply continuing to tape those remaining episodes. I would like to know one way or another if the three women that we tend to send our Friday nights with are in fact, going away into tv heaven.

Guilt and Politics

I am offically a bad blogger. I intended to blog AT LEAST every week, but alas, I have not kept up with my end of the deal. I do love tv, and I do watch too much. I just need to type more.

Less than a week ago I was watching the election results, counting up electorial votes, red/blue states and biting my nails. Happily, it seemed to end early around 10pm central time...no hanging chads, recounts or shadiness. I, once again, am proud to be an American, it has been awhile. Although, even as a midwest girl, I am vastly disappointed in the citizens of California and the crazy power of crazy christians. What does gay marriage have to do with heterosexual marriage? It's about equality and second-class citizens. But, I digress.

I am currently watching "Dancing with the Stars" as I type this, and I am so glad that the remaining duos can actually dance. After this, will be Gossip Girl, which I am LOVING this season. I heard rumors that Jenny's character is being groomed for a break-off show. Not loving the crazy black eye make-up or prep girl turned grunge, but I love the storyline. I still feel like it is too mature for a highschool show and I am not sure how I feel about my much younger sibs watching it, but in this case, bad is good. (btw, who in high school was clubbing at martini bars?)

VOTE

Because it is finally Election Day in the United States, and because the election will be covered on television, then consider this your twogirlsinlove friendly public service message: PLEASE VOTE.

Oh, and believe in hope.  I know we do around here.

Is the "Life on Mars?"

I hope you will forgive me for the bad pun that is the title, and if it hasn't made you roll your eyes too much, I hope you will continue reading.  I do also realize the title is in reference to the David Bowie song not the red planet that is our neighbor in this universe, but not being one to pass up obvious puns, I just couldn't help myself.  

What follows is a fairly lengthy post that covers generally the first two episodes of the U.S. Life on Mars. It isn't too spoilery, but if you don't want to know anything about the second episode please proceed with caution.

We are now two episodes into the new Life on Mars staring Jason O'Mara, Harvey Keitel, and Grethen Mol.  Oh, and that Soprano's Guy. This has been the new show I have been most excited to watch, and in the interest of full disclosure this is partially because I loved the UK Life on Mars.  And, despite my best efforts to NOT compare the two, I realize that was sort of impossible. (Just like if the UK decided to do a TV show called Lost about survivors of a plane crash, there is no way I couldn't compare it to you know,  Lost).  So, I decided to stop fighting this desire to not compare.  Hopefully, I have at least compared on merit and not because it isn't the UK Life on Mars. 

In answer to my title, yes I think there is Life on Mars.  If you are not familiar with the story line the gist is that a modern-day New York City cop, Sam Tyler,  is somehow transported back to the early 1970s after a car accident.  The first episode was nearly a carbon copy of the original, but it was done well.  The one part near the end,  that was not a carbon copy is a very interesting change; I am withholding judgment on this change until later in the season to decide if this change is indicative of a larger one in the overall premise of the show.  For now I will file it under the "Things that make you go hmmm" category, and I  promise to revisit it at a later date.  

Life on Mars is well shot, well-acted, and at least so far, well-written. I have not had any moments where I thought something happened too conveniently or was used as a plot device. In short, it as all seemed very organic.    I liked it and I want to see more.  

At the basic level this show is about relationships; the crime of the week is a way of examining the relationships Sam has with people both present and past (or present and future depending on how you want to look at it).  The most interesting and important of these, in my opinion,  is the one that develops between Sam and Gene Hunt, the Lieutenant in charge of the 125 Division. They are certainly a ying and a yang; Sam is meant to be more nuanced and a thinker, Gene is more simply brute force.  That the technology (or lack thereof) of the 1970s dictates a different way of policing than it does in late 2000s has a lot to do with these basic differences. Sam and Gene are at first very antagonistic toward each other, but as shown in the second episode, are growing to respect each other.  Gene's character is very revealing of Sam's inner-character in the UK edition, we'll see how it is in this one.

The other relationship I was most drawn to in the UK series is that of Annie the 1970s woman who wants to be in the force at a time when women were not doing this.   As a feminist, I always loved Annie's character, and was often frustrated at the obstacles she had to face.  Sam, being from a world where women are very involved (if not yet completely equal) in the force, more naturally believes in Annie's abilities. They grow quite close and I will be interested in to see where this relationship goes in the new one.    

There are two major differences I have found between the editions, outside of the fact that the original is only a little over 20 episodes total.  (I've already talked about what this means for UK shows versus American ones, so I won't bore you again.) The first is the character of Gene Hunt. Phillip Glenister has done a wonderful job of portraying this man first in Life on Mars and now in the current series Ashes to Ashes.  Gene Hunt is the only character I've really ever seen this actor in, so for me he is Gene Hunt.  This makes it difficult for me to form an opinion of Harvey Keitel's portrayal of Hunt.  First off, being more familiar with Keitel's resume and the type of characters he plays, I find it hard for me to warm to him.  After the first episode it was sort of difficult for me to see how Sam and Gene were going to build the relationship they had in the UK edition. The lines were the same in the two editions, but the feeling was different. However, I was much more pleased with how he was written and played in the second episode, and I am slowly getting into the new Gene Hunt. In the interest of not writing off anyone who is not Phillip Glenister, I am trying to keep that mind open. 

The other major issue is not so much a fault of the show as it is an overall problem I have with Hollywood, which is the need for everyone to be so good-looking. I love John Simm, the original Sam Tyler, and certainly he is attractive. However, he is no Jason O'Mara, he of the piecing blue eyes and strong jaw. Similarly, one of the areas that I most loved about UK Annie (Liz White) is that she was a very attainable beauty.  Good looking, but not Hollywood.  But, the U.S. had to go and make her blond,  and skinnier, and more glamourous.  Now, I don't have a problem with Gretchen Mol, I think she has done an admirable job. In fact, she is in her later 30s, which I find to be refreshing over all the 20-something young things out there.  But, every single cast member is more conventionally attractive in this cast, (than the other one) and I am sort of over Hollywood's narrow idea of beauty, especially in women. I think deep-down I always knew that the actress playing the UK Annie would never have been cast in that role in the US, and I suppose I was just disappointed to have that theory proven.  

There are other small differences, including a new character that did not exist in the first, but these don't detract from the show at all.  I love seeing 1970s New York. There was another pilot done for this show, with a mostly different cast that was set in Los Angeles.  I have to say that the choice to change the location to New York makes so much sense to me.  I think all of us can be in agreement that 1970s NYC is more interesting than 1970s L.A.   

To end a really long post, Life on Mars has stayed on my list of American shows I will make an effort to watch in the U.K.   Considering how much effort this sometimes means this is tantamount to "two thumbs up."  I'll be back mid-season to discuss it some more.  In the meantime, please (please please) tell me your thoughts in the comments section.  

  

political mayheim vs. entertainment

The US national election is in 3 weeks and the last of 3 presidental debates is currently on television. I know who I am going to vote for (Obama all the way), yet I am still watching the debate, not for the issues or entertainment, but because it is the only thing on tv. Typically Wednesday's nights in our house are full of tv, so much so that my dvr can't record it all: Bones, ANTM, Private Practice, Lipstick Jungle, Dirty Sexy Money, CSI New York, Project Runway...yes, I actually watch ALL of these shows from ONE night. (Thanks for whomever invented the DVR, you are my god) But, noooo, all of these *quality* programs are not available because our country can't figure out the issues for themselves, and enjoy watching a verbal banter of politicans. (one who is becoming more old and pastey as the weeks go on) I realize I am being narrowed minded and slightly joking, but I am hormonal (tmi) and I want my tv.

The Best (or Worst) of British Television: Lost in Austen

Welcome to the first edition of The Best (or Worst) of British Television, starting with the series Lost in Austen, which recently aired on ITV here in the UK. This column is the beginning of a semi-regular look of the happenings of British television. I will cover both series currently airing and plan to delve into the annals of British TV (covering such gems as The Office and Coupling, amongst others). There might even be a guest columnist or two on this topic. Before I begin it may be helpful to point out a few differences between British TV v. American TV. The major one being that unlike in American TV, most seasons of television that air across the pond usually consist of, at most, 13 episodes. They also tend to have less seasons, with the exception of the soap-style dramas, which go air each night and go on forever, just like our soaps. These two facts lead to tighter stories than perhaps happens in American television. Another fun fact is that the Brits call their seasons, series, such as Series One of Lost rather than Season One of Lost.

"I'm having a truly post-modern moment."-Lost in Austen

Lost in Austen is the tale of a modern-day London-ite, Amanda Price, (who lives in Hammersmith, where I work!) who is in love with the novel Pride and Prejudice. She is suffering at a job she doesn't like, and stuck in an unfulfilling relationship. She escapes into her tattered copy of Pride and Prejudice, and loves the fictional Mark Darcy. Her boring life changes in a big way when Elizabeth Bennet shows up in her bathroom. Yes, you read that correctly, her bathroom. As is true with fantasy/sci-fi dramas, one must just accept the premise without questioning too much, because otherwise one may get bogged down in reality.

What follows are four episodes that grow increasingly stronger in the story telling. I must admit that after the first episode I was a bit skeptical of where the story was heading. There was something a little contrived in how Amanda just happened to be reading Pride and Prejudice when this story began. [Again, though, for the purposes of storytelling, it necessarily has to be this way.] Nearly everything that happened in that first episode was fairly predictable (would you be surprised if I told you the boys of the novel were falling in love with the wrong people? I suspect not.), and had many classic "fish out of water" scenes. The one where Amanda curses and smokes when a lady of that time does not and one where she tries to figure out how to brush her teeth. One of the best moments in the whole series however, is when a certain scene from a very famous Pride and Prejudice movie is recreated. I won't spoil it for you, but if you want a clue read Bridget Jones's Diary.

The show began to shine when it moved away from what we "know" from the books and fleshed out the characters into real people. To wit: we all know the creepiness that is Mr. Collins, but we didn't know he had three equally as creepy brothers! Or, if you are familiar with the novel (and really that is who this series is made for), you know all about the dishonorable character of Mr. Wickham. But Lost in Austen manages to make Mr. Wickham more real and nuanced, and we learn there may be more to Mr. Wickham; I would even bet that the audience might even like him. Mr. Bingley and Mr. Darcy do not disappoint either. It is quite fun to see more of these characters and even though Amanda admits that Jane Austen must be turning in her grave at some of the things happenings, but I hope Jane would enjoy these versions of her characters.

A show based on such a loved and read novel is most likely always going to be inherently predictable, and admittedly, Lost in Austen in the end is predictable. To its credit, I was not entirely sure how it was going to end. While the ending may not be surprising, the writers had at least laid out a few different options, so it did not seem completely obvious. I do feel the ending was perhaps a little bit rushed and while things are pretty much tied up, I would have like a little bit more. Still, I quite enjoyed the series despite some of the inevitability in it, and definitely recommend watching it.

I won't give away the ending, because I suspect it may show up on BBC America sometime soon. If you don't want to wait, start here, and I trust you can figure out what to do after that. After you watch it let me know what you think and if you agree of disagree with my assessment of it.

Happy 10th Sports Night

There are many things I find hard to understand: Why women don't get paid as much as men, why people always fly-over the Midwest without stopping to see its beauty, etc., but right now, I am finding it very hard to understand how it has been TEN YEARS since Sports Night first aired on television.

Sports Night will forever be one of my favorite television shows; it features such wonderful writing, interesting characters, and of course that now-patented Aaron Sorkin walking and talking trick. It had Peter Krause before Six Feet Under, and Robert Guillaume after Soap & Benson. It gave Josh Charles, an all-time favorite of mine, his best role, introduced us to Joshua Molina and made me forget that Sabrina Lloyd was ever in that show called Sliders. Most importantly through Sports Night I grew to love one Ms. Felicity Huffman, a love that culminated to me screaming in joy when she won the Emmy a few years back. [View that video, in which she mentions Sports Night here]

One of the things I love best about Sports Night is that it showcases women in positions of power the show is run by an African-American man. I would wager that this combination doesn't actually occur that often. Mostly what I like though, is Dana; I always felt a kinship to her, and as I get older I can relate to her more and more. She loves her career, it makes her who she is, and really doesn't want to comprise it. Still, she does have a desire to settle down. How she tries to negotiate these complex feelings are messy and it doesn't always work out. But, I feel that especially at the end of Season 1, she stays true to herself.

I won't wax poetic anymore for today on the topic of Sports Night, but rest assured the topic will be revisited again (and again!).

Cheers, Sports Night. Thanks for 10 great years.

thursday night premieres

This past Thursday night was season premiere's for many fan favorites; Survivor, Ugly Betty, Grey's and ER. Reality TV's King started up another season in Eden...African style. The tribes were decided by the standard school-yard pick. There could be some great characters this season, although my favorite was voted out in the second hour; Gillian. There is a new twist this year related to exile island and it will be interesting to see who will be strong and pick the clue for the idol and who will be weak and overally secure and pick the luxury. Right now the teams do not seem evenly matched so it might be a killing at every challange.

Ugly Betty picked up right where it left off, with a short recap of her love woes and a random escape trip, complete with postcard images and pictures from her "vacation." Cute, as always. LiLo herself made another appearance as Betty's childhood rival and super-duper burger joint manager. Overall the episode was kind of lame with the standard Mode family drama. Hopefully Betty's new found freedom with her own apartment in the city will bring some new adventures.

Grey's brought some interesting storylines, a new hottie-army medic who makes out with Christina after she was stabbed by a falling icicle (dramatic and not expected) and Bernadette Peters as guest star. Broadway diva's own star made her way to prime time and I love me some Bernadette! It was a standard cat and mouse game between Meredith and McDreamy and I am personally tired of this storyline. My favorite scene in the entire 2 hour episode was when Rose told McDreamy that she was pregnant with his child, but unforunately it was just a joke. I thought there was finally be a new component between the Grey-Dreamy drama, but no-go. I hope that this season brings some closure to romance-less drama.

ER is in it's last season and it started with a boom, literally. In ER-like drama they killed off a main character in the first episode, and I cried like a baby. Many characters are leaving before the final curtain, but a few favorites from the past 15 years are returning, including Dr. Green who died years ago from a brain tumor. Noah Wyle will also be returning as fan favorite Dr.Carter, but no word yet from Clooney. I love ER, but it is time for its pulse to flatline.

with love, from Emmy

Last night was award night for television; the Emmy's were on in prime time. It was the 60th anniversery of the award show and there were some cool, and not so cool, montages to the history of television. I loved the stage sets from various shows, the musical montage of 30 tv theme songs by Josh Groban (who knew he could do a south park homage) Betty White and Lily Tomlin.

It was night of 30 Rock, Mad Men and Damages. I don't watch 30 Rock; not big on sitcoms and comedy skits although I believe the critics when they say it is genius. Mad Men, a AMC drama set in 1960s NYC advertising mayhem is the new kid on the block and it can beat up any other kid on the playground! It is freakin' amazing. T and I just watched the 1st season on DVD and it is amazing, did I just say that. The sets, fashions, acting and storylines are top notch and them winning the Emmy for Best Drama atests to that. They are currently in their second season and I believe Mad Men will be around for awhile. Way to go, AMC.

Damages, a FX thriller new last year, won multiple acting awards. They won because it was, in my opinion, the best acting on television. Damages is a legal rollercoaster of death, lies and videotapes, and I personally can not wait for the 2nd season to return. Simply Fab.

This week starts up many of the new fallseasons for the big networks. Heroes, Dancing with the Stars, Survivor, Grey's and ER return throughout the next 4 days and you can be sure I will be watching!

One more Olympic post...

After a long break, I am back, and I promise to start posting with a vengeance, so watch out! I've finished up some things and now have time and a television. Whee.

As the new fall TV season is just getting started in the U.S. I don't have too much to say on American television. Yet. But, I have a list of shows I want to give a chance, and a color coded schedule will be coming soon. But, I have been watching some stuff here in Great Britain--namely the Olympics. I know this post is a little outdated since the Michael Phelps Games (ahem, the 2008 Summer Olympics) finished about three weeks ago or so, but I hope you will indulge me for just one more Olympic post.

I did most of my watching via the internet, which I think is the wave of the future (or, I guess the wave of the present). There were several things that I liked, both about watching on-line and with the BBC broadcast. The obvious one being that it was great to be able to watch the Olympics without owning a television, because I had been worried about that, as I am AN OLYMPIC FREAK. The other nice thing about watching on the internets was that I had several different streams of sports available to me at any given time, and I could watch highlights (of say, the swimmer boys) over and over if I wanted to. Not that I did, of course.

Specifically to the BBC broadcast, first and foremost were the English, Scottish, and Irish accents. Seriously, that was fun. I also got to "meet" athletes that weren't American or have the required sob story needed to make it on American coverage. There was still plenty of "American" action, and Michael Phelps was covered in great detail.

The parts that I didn't enjoy so much included:

Losing the element of surprise. Events were shown live around 3 am in the morning and generally I woke up, opened my computer, and found the results are displayed all over my screen. I have to say, the events I managed to not know the outcome (such as the Men's 4x100 Medley Relay) were much more exciting than when I did know the results. (such as which American gymnast won the gold). I also missed not getting to see American athlete interviews: I admit it, I am a homer. I root for Americans (often, though not always) and I like to hear what the athletes have to say. Even if it is just so I can make fun of them.

The idea of showing events live is an interesting one, and I get that generally this is a good idea, but I'm not sure about it in practice. Beyond what I mentioned above, doing this meant that sometimes I only got to see highlights: if I didn't catch the event live or on rebroadcast, I didn't always get to see it, if the BBC decided not to upload the full coverage.

I do think, however, that this practice points to a more general difference in the BBC experience versus the NBC one. In the U.S., it is all about ratings, and we are fed one feature story after another, barely seeing athletes or events that aren't either American or high profile, and have lots of commercials, albeit cool ones. The Olympics are a "viewing event" so to speak, much like an extended Super Bowl. Here the Olympic coverage is much more practical and no-nonsense. Because it isn't all about ratings (as the BBC does not need commercials or ratings to survive) there isn't the sense that one needs to pull out all the stops. I saw literally, no features stories, and no commercials. I can't necessarily say that one is better than the other, as I think they both have their good and bad points. I suppose the perfect experience would be somewhere in the middle, with some features, and more events and athletes shown. Maybe in 2012 I will broadcast Sara TV with this combo of coverage.

There is just one other point I'd like to mention, mainly because I find the contrast interesting and discussion provoking. If anyone watched the diving events, and more specifically the Men's Platform Final, you know that Matthew Mitchum from Australia won. It was a very emotional victory and his final dive was beautiful. Throughout the competition, the British commentators mentioned that he had recently been through a rocky time, and that was mainly due to the fact that he had recently come out as a gay man. This was said in a very matter of fact tone, and as part of the general info on the diver, but it was pointed out doing this has been the cause of a lot of pressure on him. I remember wondering at the time if this fact was mentioned on the U.S. broadcast. I did some digging after the event and found out that this little fact was not mentioned, but other athletes' heterosexual relationships were mentioned. You can read about it here if you like, from Yahoo Sports. I am not writing this to stir up things, but because I found the contrast interesting. I'm not entirely sure as to all the reasoning behind this, but I would wager that part of it is because NBC relies upon adverstisers and high ratings to survive.

Anyway, that was my Olympics. If anyone is reading this, let me know what you think, and what you thought of your Olympic viewing experience in whatever country you are in.

I'll be back soon with many thoughts on the new Fall TV season, one of my favorite times of the year!

Labor of Love

The upcoming Labor Day weekend means one thing in tv land...it's time for fall tv to begin! I am so excited for many favorite shows to return next week; ANTM, Gossip Girl (a guilty pleasure), Bones. Pretty soon it will be time for Biggest Loser, Survivor, Grey's, the final season of ER (finally), Heroes and CSI. I am most curious about the new spin on Heroes Villians; a new expanded cast, new plots, oh my! It will still be awhile until LOST or 24 (I missed you last year Jack Bauer) reappears, but most of us will have plenty to fill our evenings! Big Brother is still in full swing, with a double elimination last night Good-bye Michelle and Olie. Even though I don't know you, you will not be missed. Dan, one of the most genious player of BB all time, is making enemies, but playing quite a game!

End of summer

Okay, I will be the first to admit that I have not been very good at keeping up with this blog. My life has been hectic and although I have been watching tv religiously, I haven't had the time or desire to blog. The end of summer tends to see a slow-down in new tv and without Big Brother, Olympics or my Bravo show's, there wouldn't be much to watch. Shear Genius (Bravo) is nearing the end of the season but that's okay, but Project Runway is in full swing. I LOVED the last episode with the designers creating appeal for a colorful set of drag queens. It was absolute fab!

The Olympics are nearing the end of its 2008 run as well and it has been quite a show. It was the year of Phelps, Nastia and Shawn Johnson and we watched the majority of prime time coverage. My only negative comment is that the prime time" coverage ends so late at night. The night of the women's overall in gymnastics ended around midnight and I could not stay up to watch it all. Granted I DVR'ed it, but still. One of the biggest competitions and most of our country was asleep. Shame. I am looking forward to the Closing Ceremonies and I am sure I will have something to say about it.

Olympics, American Style

It is the year of Michael Phelps. At least if you watch NBC. There has always been vast coverage of American athletes, but I do not remember anything of this extreme, directed towards one person. He is freakin' everywhere! (I think that NBC forgets at times that there are over 600 American Athletes competing) There is even a Phelps Phan commercial, and as I watch the prime time coverage of the Olympics tonight, he just won his third gold metal in three days. No matter how much coverage there is, I have to admit that he is amazing.

To sound off from Sara's excellent post on Olympics, London-style, I have to admit that I am glad to be home during the coverage. I do love, and cry, at the human interest stories that are abundant during prime time coverage. I love the sappy music that plays in the background and for a non-sporting person, it makes it easier to connect to the sport, through the person. And, yes, Bob Costas is a legend in American Olympics coverage...his commentary at the Opening Ceremony adds to the drama. His voice is iconic, whether you like it or not.

Every night from 7-10p.m., I watch the daily coverage. I do love that NBC covers the major events in a consolidated time frame so that we get a nice taste, but can still work, eat and carry normal life for the 16 days. And, I watch the TODAY show every morning at 7am, so I get a nice bookend to my days.

Side Note**Not sure if anyone has noticed the new line of United Airlines commercials running through the Olympics coverage, but it is artistic-genius-inspirational and simply beautiful. I am so impressed with their campaign, that I want to take a trip. I guess their marketing did their job. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzvamSr3lec

My first Olympics away from home

Before I get going, I must say in the interest of full disclosure, I LOVE THE OLYMPICS.  I love everything about them: the sports, the athletes, the outfits, the cheesy commentary, the tear-at-your-heartstrings features, the commercials...literally everything.  But, for the interest of a blog about TV, I am going to focus (as much as possible) on the television aspects of the Olympics and the overall viewing experience.  

One of the big differences that experience this year, more so than ever before, is the proliferation of streaming internet video.  I have to say it makes it so much easier for someone who does not have an actual TV set to stay connected, and it also gives quite a bit of choice on what to watch.  Obviously the jury is still out on how effective it will be, but it definitely adds a new dimension to the event.

For me most importantly, this is the first time I will ever watch the Olympics from a different location than the United States. Here in London all the coverage is from the BBC--and there is a great deal of it--especially since London will be the host in four years. The city (and country) definitely have Olympic fever. As eager as I am to see the Olympics from a different perspective, I will cop to the things I will miss: the NBC Olympic theme, Bob Costas, and the Chevy Olympic Moment they do every night.  What I won't miss--the blatant focus on American athletes at the expense of other interesting people from around the world. 

So, on to my thoughts, which is mainly a comparison of what I am used to and what I see now. The first major difference so far is that the main coverage is shown between 2 pm and 6 pm each day.  I've been trying to work out why this is done, but I haven't figured it out.  I thought it was maybe so events could be shown live, but I think China is 8 hours ahead of London, so I don't think that is why.  Since I don't know when the coverage has traditionally been shown in the past I'm not sure if this is typical or not. What I do know is how unusual it is for me!  I am used to the U.S.-style of coverage where all things important are shown in prime time.  Lucky for me I am able to watch the coverage (for the most part) during the day, but I think I would be quite frustrated if I was working full-time.  Then again, if this is how it has always been done, other people probably don't give it a second thought.

When watching the Opening Ceremony  the coverage was pretty similar to what I am used to, with the major exception being the British accents (don't you know the Olympics are being held in Chiner?). Though Michael Johnson, he of the 1996 Olympics, Nike golden shoes, and two gold medals in the 200m and 400m, is a commentator so I did get an American accent fix.  Also, I think I was sort of expecting there to be a heavy concentration on Great Britain and its athletes, but not so much. Of course during the Parade of Nations there were quite a bit of discussion on the team, but there was also as much discussion about President Bush. Granted this is a very controversial Olympics, but still it constantly amazes me how often American culture, politics, and people are mentioned in international broadcasts.  I'm not sure this is entirely a good thing, and sadly, our coverage never reciprocates. I mean seriously, can you imagine the U.S. coverage having a British person on the commentating team talking about all the British athletes and their chances. No? Me either. 

The other major difference I noticed, thus far, is the absence of the "special features" so to speak.  We are all aware of those Olympic Moments (the ones I love) and how they are designed to make you cry.  Or manipulate you, depending on your perspective and willingness to cry. And how you can't really get through an entire night of coverage without at least two of these stories. I didn't see a single one of those in the 4+ hours of coverage I saw.   But, I am actually totally okay with that.  It doesn't seem like a very British thing to do, and my tear ducts will enjoy taking some time off.

What I am excited for is the chance to see athletes that aren't American participate in events. I have already seen more gymnastics coverage of British athletes in a short 6 minute video than I probably have seen in all of my other Olympic gymnastics viewing; and believe me I have spent many (many) hours watching Olympic gymnastics.  I am excited to hear different commentary and different points of view and hear different anthems.  

As the coverage goes on I will try and talk about the similiarites and differences some more and let you know if anything else exciting happens, by way of the TV.  So please enjoy the Olympics! I know I will. 

To Love TV From Afar...

Of all the complaints I may or may not have about the United States, one thing is for sure: we make great television.  From writing, acting, execution, location, down to the general look we have definitely set the standard of TV.  Don't misunderstand (or is that 'misunderestimate?') me.  I like television from other countries, BBC America for one, has shown some of the best of British TV (Life on Mars, Dr. Who, Coupling, etc).  I certainly don't like American TV at the expense of other TV...I am an equal opportunity television watcher.  

But, what's difficult, is trying to watch that great, well-made American television when you are in a foreign land, without actually owning a TV. Yes, my friends,  a (new) television blogger without a TV.  I swear it is not because I'm one of those people (you know the kind) who say, "I don't watch TV" or "I have no need for a television."  No, it is because I am a poor graduate student living in London, who can't afford that TV.

So, I've been forced to be creative in how I watch television--and it generally involves watching it on my 13" Mac computer.  I was able to watch all of Lost, for example, thanks to iTunes.  I downloaded each episode as soon as it was available (which was never as fast as I liked). Unfortunately, that has been the exception to my general experience here.  I would be more than happy to watch episodes streaming from network websites like NBC, ABC, etc, but those are, sadly unavailable to customers outside of the US. Oh, what about Hulu you say?  Again, I'm still waiting for Hulu to allow people outside of the United States use it. But, it looks cool.  [I can't even watch clips posted on other websites from Hulu!] I would have also gladly paid to get my Battlestar Galactica fix on iTunes this season. But, thanks to Universal/NBC yanking all their shows from iTunes, I couldn't do that.  I even tried Amazon Unbox, but what do you know?  You not only have to have a PC (which I could have worked around as annoying as it is), but you guessed it: you have to be in the United States.

My point being: I have explored all the known legal ways to watch these shows, outside of watching them on a regular television. And, since at this point I can not only not afford a television here in Britain, but I can't afford the cable it would require to watch American-network TV imported, I have had to resort to the more "gray area" of streaming video. Honestly, I don't know all the copyright rules, if they are valid in different countries, or if what I am doing is actually shady; frankly I'd rather not know--I figure if it works it's fine, and if it's not fine, it will stop working.  

This route is frustrating. Often times links are dead, or don't load, or only work on this browser or that browser.  I just think it is kind of weird that someone who wants to watch TV , has tried to do it in an up and up legal fashion, and is even willing to (sometimes) pay has to even worry if he or she might be in a legal gray area.  There seems like there must be a happy medium between honoring the right to sell a product, having things be a bit more available. At least one would think there could be. [And the studios claimed they make no money from the internet when the were fighting with the Writers Guild.] 

On the plus side I now have access to the BBC iPlayer, so I get to watch lots of new television that has been previously not only unavailable but unknown to me. So, um, don't be surprised if I blog about a lot of British TV.   

Despite all the troubles I have managed to watch a fair number of the shows I love; not all of them, but I am trying to catch up.  I do wish there was a way for me to do it right, so to speak, but I'll just have to make due.  So,  don't worry come fall I'll be watching and commenting on all the great TV.  (Just don't ask me how i watched it.) 

Reality of Summer TV

The summer season brings a whole 'nother creature to t.v. programming. Although Big Brother made a late winter/spring appearance, summer is home for the king of reality! BB 10 started this week with a bang and another slew of reality stars. The oldest reality star ever, great-grandpa Jerry, is a nice change of pace to the back-stabbing young bombshells. BB is always a rollercoaster of good and bad tv, but I will be the devoted fan, watching all three episodes a week. Renna and the early player Brian are nominated for eviction. Will the house carry through their plans to evict Brian, or will his BB skills be put to the test, and succed? Guess we we'll know on the next episode.

The mainstream giant of the summer season, in my opinion, is So You Think You Can Dance? I love everything about this show, except for Mary's screams and ear-popping voice. This show catapolted the art of dance to the general public and brings multiple styles and genres into living rooms. How many average people knew about West Coast Swing, Mia Michaels, Lyrical and Cat Dealy? I love Mia Michael's routines week after week; their power and artistry pull emotions through the tv onto my couch.

On the cable front, two popular shows are Design Star on HGTV and The Next Food Network Star, on duh...the Food Network. Both are great, dramtic competitions that showcase talent and skill that most wish to have. Design Star has a Kansas City local, Jennifer from Olathe, so I definately watch the home girl. She is in the top three, and I hope she continues!

Television programming used to take a break during the summer, but with the birth of reality, it is alive and kicking!

About Sara

Sara has loved TV as long as she can remember. From early morning viewings of Romper Room and The Muppet Show she was hooked on the 'idiot box'. As a kid she audio-tape recorded shows (no VCR for her family in the 80s) like Bewitched and Little House on the Prairie and then, listened to them over and over, much to the bemusement and dismay of her family. Thankfully, her tastes have gotten much better over the years (though she still loves Bewitched and Little House), but some things never change. She has been known to watch episodes of Sports Night and Arrested Development over and over, much to the bemusement and dismay of her family (and friends!). Her current favorite show on TV right now is Lost, followed closely by Battlestar Galactica (which is the best show you're not watching because you're afraid of sci-fi), and generally thinks her taste in television is not only excellent, but always right. Except when it's, um, you know, not.

Sara also blogs at http://issarainteresting.blogspot.com/

About Jen

Everyone that knows me, knows that tv is my altar. As I am not a religious person, I worship each night to the lighted box in my rec room, on my comfy couch with my pug Lulu curled up beside me. (note, I am married, with a personal life...so I am not a total hermit) I am a devoted fan of the DVR and have owned one since they first came out. Now, not only can I watch a tv program, I am no longer responsible enough to know when it is actually on tv, what channel or if it is a dreaded re-run. The DVR puts the "L" in lazy! Once you have one, I dare you to go back.

I have been a tv junkie since the days of Who's the Boss, Growing Pains, Full House, Smurfs and The Cosby Show. Whenever I was in trouble, I was the kid that was grounded from tv, because that was really the only thing that hurt.

My spouse and I have "conversations" regarding my tv lifestyle and how it will affect our future children. (we are in the fertility process..not fun) My theory is with the DVR, I will watch my shows when the kid(s) goes to bed. I have to admit, I do not want my children to be tv junkies, and I will have to lead by example, or so they will think! Maintaining a tv lifestyle can at times, be stressful. (don't laugh) There is only so much tv a girl can watch in a week, and then trying to maintain upkeep of a house, job (yes, I work full time and watch tv full time), family, etc. it can be overwhelming. But, my tv is here to stay, I will be try my hardest to provide commentary and some mild entertainment.